300 reasons I would vote for used gym socks if it would keep John McCain out of office

May 20, 2008

Reasons 44-46

A little something for everyone…

Why you should hate McCain if you’re conservative.

Why you should hate McCain if you’re a moderate.

And why you should hate McCain if you’re progressive.

May 11, 2008

Reason #36

Filed under: Immigration,Liar — 300reasons @ 8:47 pm

Whether you’re on the right or the left, this should piss you off.

McCain is running an ad about immigration that appears to oppose comprehensive immigration reform in English, while appearing to promote it in the Spanish. If you happen to speak Spanish, watch his language on “innovation” in immigration reform. In the English, he says that he supports “pro-innovation” immigration policies, implying that he wants only “hard-working” immigrants to be rewarded with American citizenship (i.e. those who go through the official channels currently set up). In Spanish, he claims to support “innovation in immigration policy,” which sounds like support for comprehensive immigration reform. At best, it’s a sign of a very murky immigration policy. At worst, it’s deliberate dishonesty.

Via Think Progress.

May 7, 2008

Reason #26

I don’t think this is much of a surprise, but McCain has pledged that, if elected, he will appoint conservative judges.

From the Washington Post:

Highlighting an issue he plans to use aggressively in the general election campaign, Sen. John McCain on Tuesday decried “the common and systematic abuse of our federal courts by the people we entrust with judicial power” and pledged to nominate judges similar to the ones President Bush has placed on the bench.

The thing about our political system is that it’s really the judicial branch that has the most power, and the most longstanding power (remember Bush v. Gore?). When people with one political agenda dominate the judicial branch, it affects pretty much everything. In the chilling words of Grampy McSame himself, “Elections have consequences. One of the consequences is the president of the United States gets to name his or her nominees to the bench.”

April 10, 2008

Reason #20

From The Huffington Post:

A close look at John McCain’s Senate voting record on judicial confirmations makes it painfully clear that progressives need to ignore the rantings of the Ann Coulter crowd and believe John McCain when he says he will listen to Sam Brownback and appoint judges like Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia. On judges, McCain’s no moderate: if given the chance, he will appoint justices that move an already conservative Supreme Court sharply to the right.

Indeed, one looks in vain for a judge who is too ideologically conservative for McCain: he voted to confirm Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas and, unless I’ve missed something, every other Republican judicial nominee voted on in his 22 years in the Senate.

Even more tellingly, as part of his negotiation in 2005 of what has been dubbed the “Gang of 14 Deal” (more on this later), McCain pushed, hard, for the confirmation of both William Pryor and Janice Rogers Brown, the two hardest-edged conservatives appointed to the federal bench by President George W. Bush.

For background, there are nine people on the Supreme Court.  Currently, five of them support Roe vs. Wade, while four do not.  In all likelihood, the next President will get to appoint at least one Supreme Court Justice.

Oh, and the Supreme Court doesn’t just make decisions about abortion. They do everything from choosing a President (wasn’t 2000 fun?) to making decisions about global warming and disability rights. You name an issue you care about—the Supreme Court has an impact on it. Any time there’s a 5-4 decision that narrowly averts disaster of one kind or another, we should think about what a complete and utter mess we would have on our hands if McCain were President.

Just sayin’.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.