300 reasons I would vote for used gym socks if it would keep John McCain out of office

September 14, 2008

Reason #101

From The Curvature comes a great analysis of Sarah Palin’s involvement in charging rape victims in Wasilla for their own rape investigations, and her subsequent lying about that involvement:

You’ve probably read just about everywhere by now that while Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, the city billed rape victims the $1200 fee for their rape kits. Of course, Palin has tried to sidestep the question and insinuate that she had nothing, nothing at all, to do with this mess. This was clearly bullshit from day one, since the mayor of such a small town (my town is tiny and still has 2,500 more people in it than Wasilla) really has no excuse for not knowing what the fuck is going on in it.

(emphasis mine) 

As I’ve noted before, Wasilla is the same size as Bumpass, Virginia. One would assume that the mayor of such a tiny town would know what was going on there.

Considering that fact, it was already clear that Sarah Palin was lying about her involvement in charging rape victims for their rape kits (in case you’ve never heard of them, a rape kit is a kit used to collect evidence for prosecution after a sexual assault), but now we have proof. There is now a paper trail proving that Sarah Palin actively signed off on the switch from having the town cover rape investigations to the new policy of charging victims, and her claims to the contrary are outright lies.

Unfortunately, I don’t think a lot of men in politics understand what a big deal this could be for women voters (yep, even evangelical women).  I am afraid men who understand that John McCain=FAIL will miss an opportunity on this issue, because they don’t understand how visceral women’s feelings about sexual violence are.  This decision by Sarah Palin speaks to a lack of empathy on her part–it takes away from her false image as a woman “just like us,” and shows her to be quite a bit nastier than most women would be.  Further, the fact that she is lying about her involvement in this decision speaks even more to the fact that she and John McCain are liars. I hope people don’t stop talking about this.


September 11, 2008

Reason #98

Oh, how I love Katha Pollitt.

I love her questions for Sarah Palin even more. An excerpt:

§ Suppose your 14-year-old daughter Willow is brutally raped in her bedroom by an intruder. She becomes pregnant and wants an abortion. Could you tell the parents of America why you think your child and their children should be forced by law to have their rapists’ babies?

§ You say you don’t believe global warming is man-made. Could you tell us what scientists you’ve spoken with or read who have led you to that conclusion? What do you think the 2,500 scientists of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are getting wrong?

§ If you didn’t try to fire Wasilla librarian Mary Ellen Baker over her refusal to consider censoring books, why did you try to fire her?

§ What is the European Union, and how does it function?

§ Forty-seven million Americans lack health insurance. John Goodman, who has advised McCain on healthcare, has proposed redefining them as covered because, he says, anyone can get care at an ER. Do you agree with him?

§ What is the function of the Federal Reserve?

§ McCain says cutting earmarks and waste will make up for revenues lost by making the tax cuts permanent. Experts say that won’t wash. Balancing the Bush tax cuts plus new ones proposed by McCain would most likely mean cutting Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security. Which would you cut?

§ You’ve suggested that God approves of the Iraq War and the Alaska pipeline. How do you know?

If we could get just one journalist to ask Sarah Palin these questions in a context where she has to answer them. Just one.

Charlie Gibson? No?

Well, I suppose questions about mooseburgers are more important than questions about whether my teenage sister should be forced to have a child if, God forbid, she is raped. I don’t really care about that anyway. Lipstick!

By the way, in case anyone was wondering, the Violence Against Women Office? It’s part of the Department of Justice. Which is part of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. That means the President gets to make the appointments that determine what kind of work the VAWO does.

I’m gonna go out on a limb and say I think Sarah Palin’s views on sexual violence (she also made rape victims pay for their own rape kits when she was mayor) might just be relevant to her decisions about appointments.

Oh, nevermind. Lipstick!

July 16, 2008

Reason #85

Filed under: Crazypants,Sexist,Women's Rights — 300reasons @ 3:32 am

From Rum, Romanism and Rebellion comes yet more evidence of John McCain’s rampant misogynistic tendencies. Back in 1986, McCain told the following joke at a fundraiser:

Did you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die? When she finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, ‘Where is that marvelous ape?’

Ha! It’s funny, see? Because she liked being raped!

Oh John, you always keep me in stitches.

July 11, 2008

Back On…

Filed under: Reproductive Justice,Sexist,Women's Rights — 300reasons @ 3:19 am

Sorry for the absence… I’ve been away dealing with other blogs and my other life.

I don’t have much time to write tonight, but I will leave you with this to ponder:

Suck my left ovary, John McCain.

June 18, 2008

Reason #81

Filed under: Reproductive Justice,Sexist,Women's Rights — 300reasons @ 4:58 pm

I have to say, it blows my mind that there are ANY former Clinton voters considering a vote for McCain. I know this group is a tiny minority, but I have a hard time understanding how anyone who really believed in Clinton’s platform could consider a vote for McCain. Likewise for those considering “protest” votes for third party candidates, which are, in effect, a vote for McCain, since they would normally have gone to a Democrat. I’m particularly baffled by former Clinton voters who claim that they want to vote for McCain to protest sexism… What? McCain is incredibly sexist, as is his platform. His presidency would result in disaster for millions of women. True, those women would probably not be white, middle-class women, who could afford a trip to another state for an abortion and wouldn’t be the ones getting bombed. But in my version of feminism, we care about all women.

Reason #80

Filed under: Sexist — 300reasons @ 3:07 am

This is a good one.

Note: This video is NOT work safe, and unless you want to explain to the nice lady at the grocery store why your three-year-old is singing the word “cunt” at the top of his lungs, you might want to wait ’til the kids leave the room.

June 14, 2008

Reason #76

Filed under: Sexist — 300reasons @ 11:51 pm

According to ABC News, John McCain has accepted more than $300,000 in donations from Clayton Williams—a former gubernatorial candidate in Texas who once said of rape, “As long as it’s inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it.”

McCain was also planning to hold a fundraiser with Williams, until ABC News found out about the event and questioned McCain’s campaign about it.

McCain has yet to denounce Williams or return the money.

Ugh. I have to go take a shower.

ht Kos

June 9, 2008

Reason #66

Filed under: Sexist — 300reasons @ 6:49 pm

Oh no he didn’t.

John McCain’s website posted a comment (the original has been taken down, but this is the saved image) calling Hillary Clinton a b***h. Apparently McCain’s folks thought the comment was fabulous enough to highlight back in December of 2007, and they left it up until Think Progress noticed it… This morning. Clearly McCain’s concern about such gendered slurs runs deep.

Reason #65

Filed under: Healthcare,Reproductive Justice,Sexist,Women's Rights — 300reasons @ 6:28 pm

Double Speak has a great post by guest blogger David Greenberg, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Wilamette.

Greenberg notes that while McCain would overturn Roe vs. Wade if given the chance, this would only be the tip of the iceberg in his dismantling of reproductive rights. According to Greenberg, McCain is “among the most extreme members of Congress who voted against common sense measures on family planning, sex education and access to basic healthcare.”

A few highlights of McCain’s voting record:

He voted against requiring health care plans to cover birth control (3/22/03).

He voted against comprehensive, medically accurate sex education (7/25/06).

He voted against international family planning funding (3/14/96).

He voted against funding to prevent teen and unintended pregnancies (3/17/05).

He voted against public education for emergency contraception (3/17/05).

And he voted against restoring Medicaid funding that could be used for family planning for low-income women (3/17/05).

Put simply, a McCain presidency would be a nightmare for women.

H/T Feministing for the link

May 20, 2008

Reasons 44-46

A little something for everyone…

Why you should hate McCain if you’re conservative.

Why you should hate McCain if you’re a moderate.

And why you should hate McCain if you’re progressive.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.